Advertisements



Why I am still unimpressed with the Space Station dark matter search

Plot of the latest AMS-02 results (red) compared with other experiments. [Credit: CERN]

Plot of the latest AMS-02 results (red) compared with other experiments. Though these data are clearer than other experiments, I still fail to see a major trend indicating dark matter detection, as some are claiming. [Credit: CERN]

I want to find dark matter as much as anybody. But strong desires in science should always be coupled with patience, caution, and skepticism about your own wishes. That’s a hard thing, and scientists are no more immune to wishful thinking than anyone else, especially when they invest their lives in big projects. So, I’m sympathetic to those who want experiments to produce big results.

But caution is still essential, and when the press release for the latest Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer (AMS-02) results crossed my desk late last week, I was struck first by the huge difference between the tone of the piece and the actual data. The release emphasized new domains for cosmic ray data, and “tantalizing” hints about dark matter discovery, but the actual data seemed…underwhelming to me. As I wrote in The Daily Beast,

If the extra positrons are due to [dark matter] annihilations near the Milky Way’s center, then their number and energy should depend on the mass of dark matter particles. That’s a consequence  of E = mc2: the destruction of dark matter particles converts mass (m) into energy (E), some of which might get turned back into mass in the form of electrons and positrons. At some maximum energy, there won’t be enough available energy from annihilation to make new positrons, so experiments should see a sharp decrease in positron numbers beyond that maximum.

However, AMS-02 isn’t seeing that drop off yet. In fact, the data seem to show positron counts leveling off at high energy, but things are still pretty messy. [Read more…]

Yes, AMS-02 has been measuring elevated positron emissions (seen also in data from PAMELA and other experiments), but from what I can see, any trend — much less any conclusions about dark matter one way or another — is based less on evidence than on wishful thinking. The AMS-02 team obviously really really really wants there to be a sign of dark matter annihilation, but their results basically show a continuation of the same trend they demonstrated in their first data release, which I covered for Ars Technica last year.

The results from the first AMS-02 release, last year. [Credit: AMS collaboration]

The results from the first AMS-02 release, last year. [Credit: AMS collaboration]

It’s especially important to stay cautious when interpreting results like these, since they could have a less dramatic interpretation in the form of positrons produced by pulsars. In the absence of a clear, sharp drop-off that would indicate dark matter annihilation, we’re still going to have to wait for more data, whether from AMS-02 or another experiment.

Advertisements

Advertisements

Please Donate

DrMRFrancis on Twitter

  • I guess I've proven the leak is real. I can justify calling my landlord on Monday. 1 hour ago
  • Leaky sink update: I have captured all of a teaspoon of water. So who knows. 1 hour ago
  • RT @CerromeRussell: Sneaky Referee gif... Feel free to use and share https://t.co/Q3GUB0GfVQ 1 hour ago
  • Though I'm kinda shipping Riker and Worf right now. Worker? Rirf? 1 hour ago
  • Continuing my (very slow) rewatching of Star Trek TNG. The cringeworthy moments in season 2 continue apace. :P 1 hour ago

%d bloggers like this: