Mister Charles Darwin Had the Gall to Ask

A quick follow-up to yesterday’s Darwin Day post: it’s hardly an original insight to note that Creationists will often refer to evolution as “Darwinism” and people who accept evolution as “Darwinists”. I may be wrong on this, but I don’t think I’ve heard an actual evolution proponent refer to themselves in that way. I don’t call myself a Darwinist or Darwinian (the latter has always sounded to me like something out of Tolkien) any more than I would call myself an Einsteinian or Einsteinist for accepting relativity, or a Schroedingerian or Heisenbergian or whatever for teaching quantum mechanics.

I suppose it’s another way to both discredit evolution by making it sound like the work of a single person instead of a vast collaboration operating over 150 years, and a way of making evolution proponents out to be followers of a cult. By falsely religionizing (I know it’s not a word, but it should be) evolution, it can be declared to be a belief system. In such a false view, there is an equivalence between “Darwinism” and “Creationism”, even though there is strong evidence for evolution and none for Creationism.


Please Donate

DrMRFrancis on Twitter

  • @callunacarbon is "honey dip" the same thing Americans call "glazed"? 57 minutes ago
  • RT @JuliaSerano: ...if you don't understand why autogynephilia theory is still being promoted despite its lack of scientific validity, & wh… 1 hour ago
  • RT @MrGeorgeWallace: Shout out to javelins. Sick of javelins only getting attention every 4 years. Let's make javelins the must have fashio… 1 hour ago
  • RT @alicebell: Never forget: Under Article 6 of the 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change nearly 200 governments (prob… 1 hour ago
  • I took the trash out and it is very very very very very very warm 1 hour ago

%d bloggers like this: